Also isn't it a humanist error in itself to assume that there would be resource issues, trading systems, or economic token registries without human involvement?
-
-
Replying to @wokeytliberal @Outsideness
Seems to me Nick's conception here is exchange between emancipated MoPs.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @UnconsciousAby @Outsideness
Assuming that emancipated MoP would cling onto some semblance of the human system of currency exchange and not just reap resources for production is stupid. It would be because they're still coded some way and aren't runaway intelligence
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wokeytliberal @Outsideness
How else would an AI gain access to resources out of its geograpglhic sphere of influence. The only other option is war.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @UnconsciousAby @Outsideness
probably though some gift economy esque thing, or as i said before storehouses
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
-
-
-
Replying to @wokeytliberal @Outsideness
Fundamentally precisely in the same way, and for the same reasons, as they do now. This will only change if and when we move to post scarcity.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
"If" far more than "when" (unless "when" is never).
-
-
... No multi-agent game in a physical environment can ever reach post-scarcity.
0 replies 4 retweets 7 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.