More economical to see Neocam as a model for coherent republican governance packaged in Jacobite LARPing for the troll value. But pretty much everyone missed the joke.
-
-
Territorial fragmentation is always good.
0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
If I was a monarchist (rather than a neocameralist) I'd bite.
0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
It's a massively defective tacit theory of property, practically refuted in 1688 and 1776.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness @mcsam_1
Rather than what is or isn't property, it's more about what the actors in question consider to be property. And taking what you consider to be someone else's property makes you a thief, regardless of whether they actually own it.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
The actors in 1688 and 1776 were aiming to secure their property FROM the king. People might consider that deluded (but I don't).
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness @mcsam_1
That's what they rhetorically claimed. It is not actually true. I feel the subsequent reconglomeration by their heirs to be a satisfactory illustration of their actual intents.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
The royal "right" to property is grounded solely on loyalty, and thus submerges along with it. Cryptography is a better foundation. ...
-
-
... If you have to believe in it for it to be real, it isn't.
2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes - 8 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.