"NRx is monarchism/autocracy ..." -- so then why does Moldbug define the "monarch" (Neocam CEO) as an executive appointment, rather than a dynastic stock-holder?
-
-
Replying to @Outsideness
Cuz he’s trying to simplify assumptions in order to do theorycrafting. See also: fnargl, the immortal unkillable alien king
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @drethelin
More economical to see Neocam as a model for coherent republican governance packaged in Jacobite LARPing for the troll value. But pretty much everyone missed the joke.
2 replies 3 retweets 19 likes -
Territorial fragmentation is always good.
0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
If I was a monarchist (rather than a neocameralist) I'd bite.
0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
It's a massively defective tacit theory of property, practically refuted in 1688 and 1776.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
I'm on the side of Old Whigs, but they haven't been considered "progressives" for quite a while.
-
-
Replying to @mcsam_1 @Outsideness and
a lot of the confusion in this area comes from the fact that both recent progressives and recent monarchists conflate feudalism and absolutism.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes - 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.