... X is either promoting its emergence effectively, or not.
-
-
Replying to @Outsideness @linkolawave
Who exactly should the slot be left open to register the {good} descriptor— Even a teleological movement has to accurately refer to histor(icities) and be a logical continuation at least.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @CtrlRetrnRpresd @linkolawave
Practical affirmation or negation is a cybernetic function. To posit a judging subject, transcending the dynamic under evaluation and marking it with a +/- moral sign from beyond, is roughly as crude as metaphysics ever gets.
1 reply 4 retweets 20 likes -
... Rather: A positive (or explosive) cybernetic process affirms itself, by definition. A negative (or trapped) cybernetic process is denied, when it exceeds set limits, by a subject positioned as a pseudo-transcendent calibrator.
1 reply 1 retweet 14 likes -
... Nature doesn't produce neutral ecology-cops, but it evidently produces beings who think it does.
1 reply 3 retweets 15 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @linkolawave @CtrlRetrnRpresd
Certainly none that a bunch of dim apes are likely to grok.
1 reply 0 retweets 10 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @linkolawave @CtrlRetrnRpresd
The biosphere has been doing "ever increasing complexity" for over four billion years. (So looking down also works fine.)
2 replies 0 retweets 11 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
Increasing independence from human mediation is the core of the process. Once technocapital goes thoroughly extra-terrestrial it will be more robust than the biosphere has ever been.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- 2 more replies
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.