Even if strong genetic determinism is true this only applies if you take the range of available outcomes to be fixed or natural (which IS rightism?) The point of anything any dogmatic leftist said in here, however, was to establish an independence of SES and T, not SES and genes.
-
-
Strong genetic determinism is false.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
I know, if only bc human environments are themselves evolving
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @adornofthagn @Race__Realist and
also, because language is a virus. please do go on though, Nick Land having to deal with a comprehensive critique of genetic determinism by someone called RaceRealist is pretty much exactly the sort of content I'm on this website for
2 replies 0 retweets 12 likes -
"RaceRealist" is an HBD-denialist troll. You'll probably like him.
3 replies 1 retweet 10 likes -
An hbd blogger disagreeing with me? Must be a troll! The amount of bad faith says quite a lot about which side of the debate is actually committed to a dogma
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Replying to @Outsideness @nishikiprestige and
... My guess would be he's one of you guys, being tactical about, except most likely it's a cosmic antisemitism account which doesn't think we're ready for yet.
3 replies 0 retweets 3 likes
Completely serious. "Punching up" imperative is the leftist-antisemite meeting ground. Common HBD hate folllows.
-
-
Replying to @Outsideness @nishikiprestige and
..."Supernormal IQ pops need to be gassed" provides the party venue.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness @nishikiprestige and
ok I'm fairly certain no one in this conversation has said such a thing, those are cathedralite tactics you're employing and you know it
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes - 11 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.