Race Realism, the only true science, apparently gets rid of trivialities like "excluding confounding factors" and "statistical significance".https://twitter.com/Outsideness/status/1005890526317383685 …
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @anti_minotaur
Quite the opposite. The HBD side of this argument is the only one that seems to have the remotest understanding of what a confounding factor is.
2 replies 1 retweet 9 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness
If they have one that precludes controlling for SES then their understanding is pretty eclectic, to say the least. Incompatible with the one used in the sciences.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @anti_minotaur @Outsideness
don't you understand, the sciences are BAD bc they treat SES as a confounding factor rather than something that needs to be explained away in the name of [squints] political neutrality
1 reply 0 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @adornofthagn
The dogmatic assumption that SES is a genetically independent variable IS leftism.
2 replies 6 retweets 29 likes -
How is it dependent?
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Because social outcomes are predominantly genetically conditioned.
3 replies 0 retweets 16 likes -
Even if strong genetic determinism is true this only applies if you take the range of available outcomes to be fixed or natural (which IS rightism?) The point of anything any dogmatic leftist said in here, however, was to establish an independence of SES and T, not SES and genes.
3 replies 0 retweets 6 likes
"From our Testosterone motte we shall rally forth and conquer."
-
-
All available bad faith on our part will be invested in formalized x-risk blackmail, I promise!
0 replies 0 retweets 4 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.