Quite the opposite. The HBD side of this argument is the only one that seems to have the remotest understanding of what a confounding factor is.
-
-
What you're doing isn't quite science, but you're right on 'minimal level of adequacy' bit.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
He's got the sneaking feeling that he's out of his depth and that's why he's being bitchy.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I am personally going to catch all the science, lock it in a basement and make it work for my goals alone. tbs if you think treating SES as a confounding factor for T constitutes anti-realism wrt biology, I'm not terribly worried about science being committable to your cause
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.