Control for whether people are total gangstas, and the difference completely disappears.
-
-
Replying to @thomasmurphy__
When the epistemological regime is brazenly on the other side, that happens.
2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness @thomasmurphy__
It feels like I am rereading my own argument with you from last year: very little science, much social constructivism in your argument, and you fail to notice it. Nothing to do with left or right: it's about your unintended yet very real social constructivism and culturalism.
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @kkolozova @thomasmurphy__
It's actually comical how determined you guys are to dig into utterly indefensible positions. Some kind of futures market bet is probably the best way to sort this stuff out.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
... Human hormonal uniformity -- what are the odds?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @thomasmurphy__ @kkolozova
You have one crappy study. There's always going to be a crappy study. That's what residual intellectual diversity means. (And it's okay.)
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
... "Crappy" because of course if you control for the social outcomes of hormonal diversity, you eliminate the phenomenon of hormonal diversity. If you think that dam is going to hold, carry on.
-
-
any other way to tell whether hormonal diversity might be triggered by environmental features? a propensity might be inherited and not be expressed.
0 replies 0 retweets 1 like - 6 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.