In exactly the same way intelligent design is not serious. Sophistry in the service of smoke (in accordance with an agenda you no doubt understand better than I do).
-
-
What "agenda" do I push? Enlighten me.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Race__Realist @Outsideness and
Address the arguments and leave your appeals to motivation (which are false) at the door.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
If you want to be taken seriously, pick a fight with someone honest and competent like
@JayMan471 and we'll all watch.2 replies 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness @cyborg_nomade and
Hahaha. Jayman? Honestly and competent? Please. What are your thoughts, jayman?
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Race__Realist @cyborg_nomade and
Trying to convince him you're worth arguing with would help persuade people you're not just a creationist crank.
1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness @cyborg_nomade and
I'd love to discuss with him. Let's see. "Creationist crank"? On what basis? What are your thoughts on the article? Or do you need someone else to think for you?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Race__Realist @cyborg_nomade and
I'm no more inclined to second guess non-ideological genomics than I am to quibble with Elon Musk about optimum rocket design.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
-
Replying to @Race__Realist @cyborg_nomade and
No. I'm going to bed. Argue with someone who knows about this shit. My only relevant talent is an acute nose for sophistry.
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes
... Humiliate @gcochran99 in a public forum and I'm your mind-slave forever.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.