who do you think dies in that situation?
-
-
Replying to @cyborg_nomade @Outsideness and
if demands aren't met? in order of probability, everyone, those with the harder task (defence), those with the easier task (attack), no one
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @adornofthagn @Outsideness and
decreasing probability, you mean?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
-
Replying to @adornofthagn @Outsideness and
don't think I agree. those with even a minimally efficient defense would be expected to at least marginally outlive those that don't have it.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @cyborg_nomade @Outsideness and
can we really talk about attrition when it comes to x-risk capability?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @adornofthagn @Outsideness and
it tends to transcendental games, for sure. but there are defense moves in those too, mostly preemptive.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @cyborg_nomade @Outsideness and
right, but I don't think this changes much, because the brainlet insurrection at all times has the stronger incentive to strike first if successful blackmail is their only shot at survival
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @adornofthagn @cyborg_nomade and
It's not a shot at survival against an enemy that has sound Chicken Game algorithms hard-wired into its security architecture. ...
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness @cyborg_nomade and
well yeah, in that case the world burns
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
"Poor people are such total maniacs that the choice is between socialism and planetary sterilization." -- A good chicken game play, actually. We'll see much more of that if the Left gets serious.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.