
-
-
Replying to @DrMel_T @OtherSociology
I’ve noticed the Melb Science March is entire run by white male futurists this year....
4 replies 2 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @DrMel_T
I've been seeing nothing good coming out of the latest round of proposed science marches. They haven't really listened or learned a thing in one year. A shame.
1 reply 2 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @OtherSociology
I harangued
@SeanGeoghegan at 4am on the disability access plan for Canberra. He had some answers....which was more than Melb last year....who I was also haranguing3 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @DrMel_T @OtherSociology
That wasn't a haranguing! I've has worse with four brothers and four sisters.
I think we've taken on board a good bit of fair criticism. We'll learn, each time hopefully with lessons learnt for the new set of volunteer organisers.
Here is part of the @ScienceMarchCBR group.pic.twitter.com/yp4UDoW0Oo2 replies 1 retweet 4 likes -
Your March does seem diverse in the listed organisers. Sadly, Melb doesn’t seem on it. Sydney has
@hagsie among others who I’m sure are trying too. Perth organised by a PoC. Melb? Three white male futurists with political ambitions....1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @DrMel_T @SeanGeoghegan and
#diversity has strengthened#science,#M4S does try to reflect the diversity of the#work &#scientists, we are all#volunteers across the country joined by our#passion for#science as the best way to understand the world around us1 reply 1 retweet 4 likes -
Sydney March has booked Renee Cawthorne, which is terrific. Everyone else present as White, cisgender & able bodied. How does this represent diversity of science or the people of NSW? Same issues of equity, accessibility and inclusion raised last yearhttps://othersociologist.com/sociology-of-the-march-for-science/ …
3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @OtherSociology @hagsie and
And yet none of the organisers can comment on the white male futurists with political intentions in organising Melb...
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
1/Even though last year, we asked for public transparency of organisers- specifically to list E&D plans & committee member bios on the SciMarch website - this has not happened in 2018 Last year, I exposed the Science Party members in Sydney, who handled this badly & were abusive
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like
2/ Fact that no-one is listed for MELB - members nor speakers- speaks to the same shady motives of aspiring politicians, as Mel notes SciMarch made a big deal of being apolitical yet wannabe politicians use the march to put their members in prime decision-making & speaking roles
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.