maybe both can be done. in front and behind the scenes. if not why not
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
Replying to @_ayman_s @helpmeskeletor
What do you find disturbing about this critique? David is correctly arguing that White people don't get to define anti-racisn responses in ways that entrench their comfort & power. Get Up could have used their platform to elevate voices of
#POC but instead chose empty gesture1 reply 1 retweet 9 likes -
Replying to @OtherSociology @helpmeskeletor
White supremacy thrives when White people get to go about their business as usual - consuming elements of Other cultures (eg. food) - but without meaningfully challenging their own privilege. That includes making sacrifices Hence performative allyship. It's conditional & hollow.
1 reply 4 retweets 20 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
Replying to @_ayman_s @helpmeskeletor
Telling WHITE PEOPLE - and to be clear, Get Up is an org run by White for White people - to take a pic of dinner to show Dutton "we're not affected" is laziest misdirection of White privilege. White people are not affected by racism. Get Up makes no effort to centre
#POC.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @OtherSociology @helpmeskeletor
Moreover, White people's consumption of
#POC food is emblematic of White supremacy. Broad scholarship on this issue - eating the Other - appropriating certain aspects of culture while sustaining racism. Enjoying POC food does nothing to racism. WP sacrifice nothing for change.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable
-
This Tweet is unavailable
Eating the Other is established scholarship that illustrates why Whiteness is a problem. This is another useful concept in critical race theory and anti-racism practice.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.