Credit and thanks to tweeters like @IBJIYONGI @niais @lteytelman @Divya_M_P @JacquelynGill @OtherSociology and others for public analysis.
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @AnneOsterrieder @niais and
Keep in mind also that Nature Astronomy recently commissioned and published a series of articles about gender in astronomy
@AmandaConsSci1 reply 2 retweets 18 likes -
Replying to @IBJIYONGI @AnneOsterrieder and
None of us were paid for our work. And we were not told in clear terms that almost everyone's writing would be behind a paywall.
1 reply 1 retweet 21 likes -
Replying to @IBJIYONGI @AnneOsterrieder and
I made the published version of my article available for free on my website and got harangued about copyright.
1 reply 1 retweet 19 likes -
Replying to @IBJIYONGI @AnneOsterrieder and
Even when Nature is supposedly centering marginalized voices, they do it in a very fucked up way.
1 reply 4 retweets 30 likes -
Replying to @IBJIYONGI @AnneOsterrieder and
I think that right now no one should go along with their model of doing something TERRIBLE & then getting traffic out of free responses
1 reply 3 retweets 29 likes -
Replying to @IBJIYONGI @AnneOsterrieder and
Unlike Science, Nature is a for-profit publication of Springer. So they are going to try and make money off the pain they caused.
5 replies 2 retweets 30 likes -
Replying to @IBJIYONGI @AnneOsterrieder and
Another disturbing pattern is that by cherry picking letters- having published racist defence of science- they can now recast it as "debate"
1 reply 4 retweets 15 likes -
Replying to @OtherSociology @IBJIYONGI and
On one hand, if they wanted scientific dialogue on racist monuments, they should have commissioned experts. Other hand, racism is not debate
1 reply 5 retweets 15 likes -
Replying to @OtherSociology @IBJIYONGI and
To recast as debate reaffirms that there's two equally valid scholarly sides to racism. There isn't. We don't accept this for climate change
2 replies 7 retweets 22 likes
Underhanded way of trying to reestablish their editorial as one side of many. Not the spirit of editorial which takes unequivocal stance
-
-
Replying to @OtherSociology @IBJIYONGI and
Editors chose to use significant power of their platform to draw their official stance on scientific racism. This is not inconsequential.
0 replies 0 retweets 12 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.