I got an email that my letter is under consideration by the correspondence section, which is funny, as I never submitted it there.https://twitter.com/amandaconssci/status/906174141849452544 …
Show this thread
-
Another disturbing pattern is that by cherry picking letters- having published racist defence of science- they can now recast it as "debate"
On one hand, if they wanted scientific dialogue on racist monuments, they should have commissioned experts. Other hand, racism is not debate
-
-
To recast as debate reaffirms that there's two equally valid scholarly sides to racism. There isn't. We don't accept this for climate change
-
Underhanded way of trying to reestablish their editorial as one side of many. Not the spirit of editorial which takes unequivocal stance
-
Editors chose to use significant power of their platform to draw their official stance on scientific racism. This is not inconsequential.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.