Most historical & current equity & diversity programs aim to "fix" individuals. They are fatally flawed because they don't address systems.
-
-
Replying to @OtherSociology
If the issue was simply building up "confidence" in minorities & White women, inequity would be overcome by now. But the issues persist.
1 reply 9 retweets 31 likes -
Replying to @OtherSociology
Endless research shows that minorities & White women can be as "confident" as possible but the structural barriers stop them progressing.
1 reply 21 retweets 43 likes -
Replying to @OtherSociology
Longitudinal research shows individual-level programs (mentoring, bias training) benefit only tiny subgroup of White, middle class women
2 replies 12 retweets 26 likes -
Replying to @OtherSociology
Why? Because current approaches still put the onus on individual WW & URM with no power to fit themselves into a system made for White men.
1 reply 7 retweets 17 likes -
Replying to @OtherSociology
E.g. "Bargaining for promotions" training for women teach women to be more masculine (use "I" language rather than "we"!). That's status quo
1 reply 2 retweets 12 likes -
Replying to @OtherSociology
Treating minorities as White women as the problem is a big part of inequality. And most policies and programs get this wrong.
1 reply 4 retweets 10 likes -
Replying to @OtherSociology
Presumption is system can stay unperturbed but we just need to hire more minorities & White women & things will improve. Not evidence based.
1 reply 4 retweets 16 likes -
Replying to @OtherSociology
Did your work fail to recruit women? Does your team employ disabled people in prof roles? Are your teams led by senior Aboriginal people?
1 reply 4 retweets 15 likes
Orgs fail to live up to equity & diversity bc programs & policies guided by "intuition" rather than targeting systemic issues via evidence.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.