The findings are important but we are way past the need for more data of what we already know. Time to fix this hurtful system.
-
-
Totally agree. Sadly, it takes this type of data & negative press for action to occur. WOC have been sharing these experiences for years.
2 replies 4 retweets 4 likes -
Yep. Lived experiences documented. And
#WOC lead this research, institutional action, protests, at great personal & professional costs.2 replies 3 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @OtherSociology @IVAPhD and
Love the study; but it is led by WW. I deeply respect them but they will get more respect & attention than Others who came before.
2 replies 2 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @OtherSociology @IVAPhD and
It is a fact we all know from experience & existing studies that WP are recognised for saying what
#WOC have sacrificed to have heard.1 reply 1 retweet 6 likes -
YES! It becomes "real" or legitimized now.
1 reply 1 retweet 4 likes -
Perfect summary. I've been thinking about this a lot overnight & will continue to reflect. Power imbalances replicated, despite useful data
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
You've said it perfectly. Sometimes hard to acknowledge inherent power & race dynamics without negating the results of the study.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
And the competing pressures. 1/ Study is excellent; much needed esp for astro prof society; resonates deeply. 2/ WW led, so WP will listen..
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @OtherSociology @IVAPhD and
3/ WM will latch onto reflection of 2 to undo benefit of 1. Pressure to support good work vs broader context- WW once again speaking for WOC
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
Can't let WP define this convo (importance of race & gender dynamics of who speaks & who is heard on inequity) but still tough.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.