Yup! Or in my case WW in my dept said I brought the racism when I entered so I was the problem and not their blatant distain of my work
-
Yep. Lived experiences documented. And
#WOC lead this research, institutional action, protests, at great personal & professional costs.
Love the study; but it is led by WW. I deeply respect them but they will get more respect & attention than Others who came before.
-
-
It is a fact we all know from experience & existing studies that WP are recognised for saying what
#WOC have sacrificed to have heard. -
YES! It becomes "real" or legitimized now.
-
Perfect summary. I've been thinking about this a lot overnight & will continue to reflect. Power imbalances replicated, despite useful data
-
You've said it perfectly. Sometimes hard to acknowledge inherent power & race dynamics without negating the results of the study.
-
And the competing pressures. 1/ Study is excellent; much needed esp for astro prof society; resonates deeply. 2/ WW led, so WP will listen..
-
3/ WM will latch onto reflection of 2 to undo benefit of 1. Pressure to support good work vs broader context- WW once again speaking for WOC
-
Can't let WP define this convo (importance of race & gender dynamics of who speaks & who is heard on inequity) but still tough.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Yes. Sad but true.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.