Meta-analysis of 343 studies people less likely to participate in counterproductive workplace research = underreporting of -ve experiences
#WOC observe higher rates of negative gender & race remarks; not masculine or feminine enough; & physical abilityhttp://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2017JE005256/full …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"Never has awareness of hostile workplace behaviours in the sciences been so strong, and the possibility for change so great." YES!
-
88% of respondents heard negative language from peers at their current career position, 51.9% from supervisors, & 88% from others.
-
39% report experiencing verbal harassment at their current position & 9% physical harassment. 27% feel unsafe at their current role.
-
11% skipped attending at least one professional event (class, meeting, conference, or fieldwork) because they felt unsafe at current role.
-
#POC significantly more likely than White respondents to observe racism or homophobia & have experienced both verbal and physical harassment -
More
#POC felt unsafe as a result of their race at work (24% versus 1%, p < 0.001). POC experience double jeopardy because of race & gender -
"Across most statistically significant analyses, women of colour observed highest frequencies of problematic remarks [racism/sexism+]."
#WOC -
"
#WOC were the most likely to feel unsafe in their place of work due to their race, gender, & religion*" *Latter not significant.#marginsci - 14 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Want more insight into gendered/racial/intersectional harassment in the sciences and society more broadly? Follow
@OtherSociologyhttps://twitter.com/OtherSociology/status/884428244098834433 …Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.