Has anyone done this yet for POC academics? https://dynamicecology.wordpress.com/2017/07/06/guest-post-the-day-i-broke-some-twitter-feeds-insights-into-sexism-in-academia-part-1/ …https://twitter.com/gbaucom/status/872446177580593152 …
-
-
Maybe author will weigh in, but could she perhaps not want to step on toes? Bad also for WW to say what experience POC have?
-
Probably stepping in it myself now.
-
Hi. The author replicates marginalisation of WOC by entire framing, including switching to "POC" - not WOC - when mentioning race.
-
Why do White women do this? Because they see gender as White women, but race is for Others. They don't see race affects gender & vice versa
-
White women notice gender inequality when there are no White women. They are satisfied about gender balance when it's 50/50 cis WW & WM
-
A panel with 50/50 cis WM & WW is both a gender equity AND race equity issue. White women don't notice. See here:https://twitter.com/i/moments/877216881660362752 …
-
As to your original question, consider how White women in sci react when White men exclude women from analyses, conversations, awards, etc.
-
White women don't say: "Wait a minute, let's hear from the White man. Maybe he didn't want to step on women's toes!" They don't excuse this
- 7 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Hm. Thinking more about throw-away line. In the meantime, can tell you that I chose an example from a spreadsheet w. no id'ing info
-
& more WW than WOC responded (appreciate thought below on safety of open response). I agree, I should have highlighted WOC responses.
-
It strikes me as an opportunity lost.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.