Earlier I explained #WhitePrivilege works in science. Dismissing a #WOC's analysis as "critical & offensive" without data is another example
-
-
Replying to @OtherSociology
#WOC are routinely called angry/ mean/ rude/ aggressive in science (& other fields). It's an attempt to discredit our knowledge. It's racism1 reply 4 retweets 22 likes -
Replying to @OtherSociology
Even though all women face elements of "you're mean" when we speak up, White women also deploy this discourse on
#WOC. That's racism.2 replies 3 retweets 12 likes -
Replying to @OtherSociology
This is
#intersectionality:#WOC face sexism AS WELL AS racism & other forms of structural discrimination from more powerful/majority groups1 reply 2 retweets 10 likes -
Replying to @OtherSociology
White woman feels entitled to jump into 1st interaction w/ me on MY sociology thread to disparage analysis not on theory but personal attack
2 replies 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @OtherSociology
I've explained this already today so I'll say briefly: ALL interactions are social; race, gender & other dynamics ALWAYS present, inc online
1 reply 4 retweets 22 likes
Again: White people, incl White women, think they can opt out or "not see" when they're using/don't mean to use racism. Bias is always there
-
-
Replying to @OtherSociology
A parallel would be thinking that vegan or vegetarian diets are choices, but carnism is not.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.