It's not that NDT is beyond reproach, no one is, it's that anti-Black dynamics matter as well as what's expected of Black people in science.
-
-
2/2 *Relatively less meaning cisgender Black men to other Black people NOT White women: that's where this NDT tag has gone very wrong.
-
Black men have male privilege; but White women who think WW are most disadvantaged are deploying
#WhitePrivilege & thus contribute to racism -
Finally, I see some
#POC using the#NDTMeetScienceTwitter tag. Please stop modelling yourselves on White people's sci interests &#scicomm. -
You don't have to like NDT to see how
#NDTMeetScienceTwitter feeds#WhitePrivilege & anti-Blackness by sheer ignorace of what he said. -
English-speaking
#SciComm has many probs with equity & diversity; chiefly White scientists are only aware of, & care for, other White scis. -
Now you know more about
#WhitePrivilege & how it confers dominance whether you're consciously benefiting or not. What will you do about it? -
Thank you for sharing insights how
#BillMeetScienceTwitter &#NDTMeetScienceTwitter differ&how our actions help/hurt#POCsci
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.