We have to deal with rubbish evo psych study described here: "homosexual women evolved for men's pleasure." NO.https://twitter.com/PinkNews/status/865610903986819072 …
-
-
Same-sex relationships have had elevated status in many cultures, esp men. https://othersociologist.com/sociology-of-sexuality/ … Christianity & colonalism changed this
-
Let's go back to rubbish evo psych study. As you see, premise that sex is primarily about reproduction is flawed, reflecting cultural bias
-
Study seeks to explain why same-sex attraction exists, given this does not lead to reproduction. Ignores that LGBTQIA people also want kids
-
Ignores that not all heterosexual people (just as not all LGBTQIA people) want kids. Ignores that asexual people don't desire sex.
-
Study's quoted proportions on sexual *attraction* for Greece (where study was conducted) match other OECD nations like Australia:
-
Study: 3–8% of Greek men & 14–15% of identify as heterosexual but experience same sex attraction; 0.5–5% of men & 2–4% of women are bisexual
-
Study picks up same trend we see in OECD nations: more women *report* same-sex attraction. Researchers want to know why & jump to evolution
-
There is plethora of research that already explains this: it is *relatively* more socially acceptable for women to admit same-sex attraction
-
#Sociology studies 3 broad elements of sexuality: identity, attraction and behaviour. These 3 do not always match up in ways people expect. -
People may have heterosexual identity but experience desire for same gender, or may have one or several sexual encounters with same gender
-
Heterosexual women are more willing to report same sex attraction & have acted on it. Hetero men less likely to act on same sex attraction
-
Heterosexual men experience higher psychosocial distress when they have same sex attraction because homophobia is stronger for them
-
Norms about desire in Western culture have changed over time, shaping sexual behaviour. Women's sexuality was once pathologised as excessive
-
Laws governing age of sexual consent today are different for hetero people, gay men & lesbians because of the legacy of Queen Victoria
-
The word "homosexual" was invented after the Queen became troubled by gay men. Word "heterosexual" invented AFTERhttps://www.amazon.com/History-Sexuality-Vol-Introduction/dp/0679724699 …
-
Queen would not consider that women would have sex with women, so medicalisation of homosexuality initially focused on men. ∴ different laws
-
Women's sexuality is culturally restrained. Attitudes to lesbians was not always stuff of fantasies, but controversyhttps://othersociologist.com/2012/09/15/women-sexuality-wwi/ …
-
Over time, as fiction & pornography changed, heterosexual male norms appropriated women having sex with women as a sexual fantasy.
-
Back to the study: it asks: why do more women report attraction to women? Well, sexuality studies have answered this: sanctions have changed
-
While it is more socially acceptable for women to report same-gender attraction, the sanctions are tougher on lesbians & bisexual women
-
That is heterosexual women may fantasise & act on same-gender attraction, but they do so b/c it doesn't really disrupt heterosexual identity
-
Greek study does not take this into account. Instead, it argues that men's desire & approval of seeing women together is evolutionary drive
-
So its hypothesis is already flawed: it forces an evolutionary perspective that does not take into history & culture, as I've just shown.
-
Study begins by considering that same-gender attraction in women may be a genetic mutation. To put it another way: that it's abnormal. WRONG
-
Taking a leaf out of Queen Victoria handbook, study does not consider gay men's sex with empiricism or how gay sex fits with this evo theory
-
Study does not ask (under their warped logic): has gay men's sex evolved to satisfy heterosexual men's evolution?
-
Consider why this was not even hypothesised: homophobia prevents a male-led team to apply same (erroneous) evo psych logic to gay men
-
Study then admits that gene mutation is not the whole story- mind you the references cited DO NOT have emprirical evidence for this theory
-
In fact, of the 7 sources cited, 3 are general texts on sexuality NOT proof of gene mutation & rest are the 1st author citing himself (!).
-
Study then develops its "male choice hypothesis" for same-gender attraction among women using the NON SCIENTIFIC concept of cuckoldry.
- 27 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.