"At a loss?" You characterise #POC & transgender sociologists who critiqued your published article as Twitter rant.https://twitter.com/familyunequal/status/867557546910986240 …
-
2/ Did you know Contexts is hawking Dolezal piece on Twitter & therefore Twitter is valid place for response?
3/ Did you know Twitter has strong & influential acadmic networks? AND vital #POC & transgender networks? It's a fine place for discussion.
-
-
While your one-word responses are insightful, you're hiding behind academic & White male privilege. Twitter is an academic tool.
-
Minority researchers use Twitter to discuss issues & our research. White cisgender heterosexist patriarchy in academia is a barrier to us.
-
Not to "suggest" or "let" you do anything, but if you told me what you actually do want me to do I might understand this situation better.
-
We've been very clear: instead of dismissing expert critiques, reflect on them. Consider this published piece is harmful & stop promoting it
-
Use the critical thinking & reflexivity that sits at the heart of sociology to consider why your cavalier editorial is not collegial.
-
There is nothing brave about the fact that you published an article that had no sociology. It's just Dolezal spinning her grift.
-
Your editorial has the gall to refer to scholars on Twitter as "hot & bothered." No idea what minorities go through for our scholarship.
- 1 more reply
New conversation
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.