"At a loss?" You characterise #POC & transgender sociologists who critiqued your published article as Twitter rant.https://twitter.com/familyunequal/status/867557546910986240 …
-
I'm just not going to argue the merits on twitter right now. So, maybe that's evading. Did you know some people don't even use twitter?
1/ "Did you know some people don't even use twitter?" Did you know not all people read Contexts?
-
-
2/ Did you know Contexts is hawking Dolezal piece on Twitter & therefore Twitter is valid place for response?
-
3/ Did you know Twitter has strong & influential acadmic networks? AND vital
#POC & transgender networks? It's a fine place for discussion. -
While your one-word responses are insightful, you're hiding behind academic & White male privilege. Twitter is an academic tool.
-
Minority researchers use Twitter to discuss issues & our research. White cisgender heterosexist patriarchy in academia is a barrier to us.
-
Not to "suggest" or "let" you do anything, but if you told me what you actually do want me to do I might understand this situation better.
-
We've been very clear: instead of dismissing expert critiques, reflect on them. Consider this published piece is harmful & stop promoting it
-
Use the critical thinking & reflexivity that sits at the heart of sociology to consider why your cavalier editorial is not collegial.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.