Right. So an article with no sociological critique is then critiqued after publication. That's how science workshttps://twitter.com/contextsmag/status/867554175046909952 …
-
-
-
Replying to @alexhaagaard
Yep. He's already dismissed POC & transgender scholars in his editorial. By his own words, he's dismissed us.
1 reply 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @OtherSociology
And it frustrates me so much the extent to which academic types dismiss social media commentary as a valid form of discourse.
2 replies 2 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @alexhaagaard @OtherSociology
It's racist, ableist, classist gatekeeping.
1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @alexhaagaard
Gendered too. Both these eds are cisgender men defending anti-Black, transphobic oppression
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @OtherSociology
I was appalled by the defense in the Times piece that lived experience was 'outside the scope' of Tuvel's piece.
2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes
NYT as well as editorial in Contexts are male academics defending the right of cisgender people esp White academics to maintain status quo
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.