Right. So an article with no sociological critique is then critiqued after publication. That's how science workshttps://twitter.com/contextsmag/status/867554175046909952 …
-
It's racist, ableist, classist gatekeeping.
Gendered too. Both these eds are cisgender men defending anti-Black, transphobic oppression
-
-
I was appalled by the defense in the Times piece that lived experience was 'outside the scope' of Tuvel's piece.
-
NYT as well as editorial in Contexts are male academics defending the right of cisgender people esp White academics to maintain status quo
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.