So @contextsmag is deeply committed to hard sell of Dolezal. They flog their piece again in connection to Tuvel https://www.facebook.com/contextsmag/posts/10155324430079732 …
-
Considered, not dismissed. Happy to consider submissions in response for the magazine, but have received none.
I know range. Group of us saying RD piece missed 
not 
Dissenting opinion dismissed 
vs considered. See You keep saying this @familyunequal as if POC & transgender studies experts need to publish with you before you engage with our expertise
-
-
That's a power play and one that carries history of abuse given your status as cisgender White man: "come and be judged by me on my grounds"
-
1/ Your magazine published a piece that you know
#POC & transgender people are opposed to for lack of critical thinking. Then you & co-ed -
2/ use your publication to pat yourselves on the back for publishing the article plus you dismiss minority sociologists' critique same time
-
3/ Your publication continues to promote the article in connection to other pieces that minorities have similarly critiqued. Why should we
-
4/ consider REPUBLISHING what we've already said when you won't engage with the critique on our own public platforms?
-
You should only do that if you want your critique published in the magazine.
-
That's right
@familyunequal. Your repeated defence that we should publish in your mag is not really an argument.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I'm an editor of the magazine. We published an article by a sociologist. Some people don't like it. We invite a response. Pretty normal.
-
(from pnc obv). I'm not prepared to research and write a response. I am prepared to publish one.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.