So @contextsmag is deeply committed to hard sell of Dolezal. They flog their piece again in connection to Tuvel https://www.facebook.com/contextsmag/posts/10155324430079732 …
-
Cisgender men & White women feminists swing the "academic freedom" argument like a club, aiming to squash minority scholars as "insidious"
Many #POC anti-racism & transgender scholars have pointed out probs of "transracialism" - poorly theorised concept lacking empirical rigour
-
-
In
#sociology we must see that groups least likely to succeed in our field -#POC & transgender people - are targets of bad science. -
So while sociologists with race & gender privilege argue academic freedom (for some), this gatekeeping supports inequality in our discipline
-
Bad
#sociology should never be tolerated. Informed critique by minority sociologists, whether in class, on campus or social media, is valid.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Full disclosure, I thought the reaction to the Tuvel article was overheated and wrote as such. But I"m struggled to find just one clear
-
explanation of what conceptual mistake she made that was so severe the article should have been pulled or never published. Can you point
-
me in that direction? I want to make sure I at least understand the argument. Some of the critiques I've seen don't make sense.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
This Tweet is unavailable
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.