Hypatia's editor Sally Scholz & Board President Miriam Solomon - both cis- White women, stand by racist transphobiahttp://www.chronicle.com/article/A-Journal-Article-Provoked-a/240021?cid=wcontentlist_hp_latest …
-
-
Replying to @OtherSociology
The peer review process is only as good as its editors and reviewers. Hypatia lacks diversity so it produces exclusionary White feminism
1 reply 5 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @OtherSociology
The peer review process does not end at publication. Scientific community engages with papers to test or debate robustness of ideas.
1 reply 7 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @OtherSociology
Hypatia is now going through usual science process. Scientists who are experts in race & transgender studies are holding paper accountable.
1 reply 2 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @OtherSociology
Had race & transgender experts been part of review process, paper would NOT have been recommended for publication to Hypatia editors.
1 reply 2 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @OtherSociology
Science publications, including feminist journals, must diversify their editors and Board members if they want to produce rigorous science.
1 reply 6 retweets 10 likes
Women scientists in general unite to call out sexism in sci publishing across disciplines We MUST rise to critique of racism& transphobia
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.