Hypatia's editor Sally Scholz & Board President Miriam Solomon - both cis- White women, stand by racist transphobiahttp://www.chronicle.com/article/A-Journal-Article-Provoked-a/240021?cid=wcontentlist_hp_latest …
The peer review process is only as good as its editors and reviewers. Hypatia lacks diversity so it produces exclusionary White feminism
-
-
The peer review process does not end at publication. Scientific community engages with papers to test or debate robustness of ideas.
-
Hypatia is now going through usual science process. Scientists who are experts in race & transgender studies are holding paper accountable.
-
Had race & transgender experts been part of review process, paper would NOT have been recommended for publication to Hypatia editors.
-
Science publications, including feminist journals, must diversify their editors and Board members if they want to produce rigorous science.
-
Women scientists in general unite to call out sexism in sci publishing across disciplines We MUST rise to critique of racism& transphobia
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.