Guess what's on the front of the @ScienceMarchDC page? It's the co-opting of #maginsci by those who resisted diversity & who excluded URM!pic.twitter.com/eDObPzDi0m
Things to note: 1/ "NoSidesInScience" is that the same apolitical/ non-partisan line regurgitated for the next phase of SciMarch? #marginsci
-
-
2/ "FutureOfScience" beside
#marginsci": aside from the fact that this is terrible social marketing (TWO hashtags for same activity
)... -
...What's the purpose of "What do you want the future to be?" March passed; they excluded URM who were proactive on diversity.
#marginsci -
3/
#Marginsci is used for conversation led by whom? No attribution to Dr@ThePurplePage. No connection to those who contributed to critique -
4/
#Marginsci subsumed. Attempt to override current conversation by talking about "future" & "most negatively affected." No mention of URM -
Classic whitewashing of social protest movement. Minorities have been removed. Coversation appears to be about any/everybody.
#marginsci -
5/ "Share your personal stories & experiences, resources, & reflections at the intersection of science, society, & the future."
#marginsci -
Wow. Ignored
#intersectionality at the march, appears to evoke it here, but in fact removes concept from its anti-racist meaning.#marginsci -
Digital postcards don't even work. So what's the point? The co-opting, because of unclear language, could be perceived to mean "science."
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.