The concept's been used in many ways, such as media ownership. But in academia there's a move to use this to discredit affirmative action
-
-
Replying to @OtherSociology
I suspected this was the case, especially with his follow-ups.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @DrMRFrancis
Yes it's troubling. People who sprout this term also support idea that there should be quotas for political affiliations amongst faculty.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @OtherSociology
The last college where I taught had an entire economics department dominated by disciples of Ayn Rand. They ran the ethics program too.
2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @DrMRFrancis
You've just described my nightmare/ the greatest horror story ever.
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @OtherSociology
Oh, I lived that nightmare. The same guy who lectured me about how laissez-faire capitalism is the most Christian ran for Congress and won.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
-
-
Replying to @DrMRFrancis
"Masters of divinity... and PhD in economics...." Op ed: "5 ways next Congress can protect gun rights" Why you point me to scary things?!pic.twitter.com/7Q5QEg110K
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @OtherSociology
He also claimed critics and protestors are all paid agitators, not people with real grievances.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
Political disenfranchisement (requiring serious attention in all democracies) as paid agitation - this guy sounds like the total package!
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
