"Ironically" scholarship on diversity doesn't yield to White men's subjective opinions of diversity https://twitter.com/theandrewglover/status/856098284200382464 … #marginsci
-
If it's unintentional neglect, fair enough. If it's intentional, it suggests you're trying control this discourse for particular ends.
Right. Minority studies scholars are trying to "control the discourse" of SciMarch, which you've only just found out about. #marginsci
-
-
Known about it for ages, read your article when it got rejected by mainstream press. Like I said, I agree with what it says.
-
I just question why you omit viewpoint diversity, in this article and others, from your otherwise meticulous analysis of diversity in sci
-
Viewpoints are changeable/malleable/debatable/validifiable in ways e.g., skin color is not.
-
So presumably you wouldn't consider religion a diversity issue, since it's changeable? I guess Muslims are out of luck then...
-
Social inclusion of Muslims is one of my areas of research. You're using Muslims to make an argument, but you tweet Islamophobia. Great work
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Still haven't said why you omit viewpoint diversity
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.