Why Memphis Has Two Marches for Science #marginsci #marchforsciencehttps://www.wired.com/2017/04/memphis-two-marches-science/?mbid=social_twitter_onsiteshare …
-
-
Replying to @AnnaIntegrated
thanks to
@christineliuart showing me the#marginsci corner of twitter, where I found out about@901ScienceMarch and@ScienceMarchMEM1 reply 6 retweets 13 likes -
Replying to @AnnaIntegrated @christineliuart and
From story: Scientists want to show a united front. That in itself is a false picture of science because we are not united -
@OtherSociology1 reply 9 retweets 14 likes -
Replying to @AnnaIntegrated @christineliuart and
.I would hope that we are united over the necessity of science, evidence-based policy, and funding, but I guess that isn't the case. Bummer.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ScienceMarchMEM @AnnaIntegrated and
We could be united if all scientists embrace social justice movements, which scientists have contributed to, as learned from, for decades.
2 replies 14 retweets 45 likes -
Replying to @OtherSociology @AnnaIntegrated and


I agree with you, but not all scientists do. We support ALL scientists and want to involve them in the movement. #standupforscience7 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ScienceMarchMEM @OtherSociology and
So why choose to prioritize scientists who are anti-diversity when you could choose to support URM?
2 replies 6 retweets 23 likes -
Replying to @christineliuart @OtherSociology and
We support both... However, a bit unclear how you reached an illusory assumption. False to state that we are supporting anti-diversity.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Your Rally says 901 March focus on URM is partisan/ politicising science. That's anti-diversity discourse http://www.minoritypostdoc.org/view/2017-8-1-zevallos-MfSDiversityDiscourse.html … #marginscipic.twitter.com/g7ohP65lLw
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.