goodness gracious
-
-
If this thought were better explored (i.e. explicitly name the subset that gets the bulk of funding) Would it be less silencing?pic.twitter.com/7eyEDEKlZ4
-
1/2 Not really. The author presents no original ideas, and is only re-purposing the arguments of minorities to mask his real intention.
-
2/2 The post is classic "new racism." He pretends to see two sides to oppression, as if both equally valid, to serve his agenda.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
"It's a zero sum game and my science is more important than your POC/LGBTQI/Ability/Women's issues"
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.