goodness gracious
-
-
"I care about diversity but also I'll name WOC as 'critical.' Also I wish I could write racist stuff without being criticised."
-
"It's so brave to speak your mind about how all those shrill Black and brown women should swallow their politics and not speak their minds"
-
"If you ask me, White men don't have enough platforms to discuss how much they dominate everything in science & complain about POC's rights"
-
"I'm so tired because the mean old disabled folks and/or WOC are expending a nontrivial amount of emotional energy on my bullshit"
-
"I use big words to mask my racism, but actually don't make any sense; also URM need to march we need your bodies to make up numbers."
-
If this thought were better explored (i.e. explicitly name the subset that gets the bulk of funding) Would it be less silencing?pic.twitter.com/7eyEDEKlZ4
-
1/2 Not really. The author presents no original ideas, and is only re-purposing the arguments of minorities to mask his real intention.
-
2/2 The post is classic "new racism." He pretends to see two sides to oppression, as if both equally valid, to serve his agenda.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.