I pushed back strongly against the party's involvement. The orgs with party ties are acting as individuals. I wouldn't be involved otherwise
-
2/ Don't play the
#WOC card on me - I am a WOC dedicated to WOC research & social justice making@ScienceMarchAu accountable for diversity
3/ You & other members from @SciencePartyAus are POLITICAL CANDIDATES currently raising money for your campaign. That's conflict of interestpic.twitter.com/pptNGRVFHF
-
-
4/ Political parties are required to make public their conflicts of interest.
@ScienceMarchAu has marketed it is non-partisan. This is COI -
5/ Everyone in your party & connected to the
@ScienceMarchAu have deflected serious public transparency issues about the march.#marginsci -
6/ Not sure how public is meant to trust your campaign given your party don't care about and/or understand COI, but hey, that's your prob
-
7/ Issue here is the
@ScienceMarchAu; the fact that involvement of political candidates undermines how the march was marketed. -
8/ All of you respond with emotion, rather than collectively regrouping and managing lack of transparency & conflict of interest.
#marginsci -
9/ Conflict of interest matters in science as well; not sure why you're collectively not aware of this given you're a party for science.
-
10/ Public was deceived via lack of transparency. Take this seriously. Understand this weakens potential policy impact march might have made
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.