The march has publicised heavily that it's non-partisan: it has 15 candidates running for pol seats. Five members in the March. That's a COI
-
1/ "Please direct any criticism...to me" - you're already in this conversation so it's very much directed at you as much everyone on thread
2/ Don't play the #WOC card on me - I am a WOC dedicated to WOC research & social justice making @ScienceMarchAu accountable for diversity
-
-
3/ You & other members from
@SciencePartyAus are POLITICAL CANDIDATES currently raising money for your campaign. That's conflict of interestpic.twitter.com/pptNGRVFHF
-
4/ Political parties are required to make public their conflicts of interest.
@ScienceMarchAu has marketed it is non-partisan. This is COI -
5/ Everyone in your party & connected to the
@ScienceMarchAu have deflected serious public transparency issues about the march.#marginsci -
6/ Not sure how public is meant to trust your campaign given your party don't care about and/or understand COI, but hey, that's your prob
-
7/ Issue here is the
@ScienceMarchAu; the fact that involvement of political candidates undermines how the march was marketed. -
8/ All of you respond with emotion, rather than collectively regrouping and managing lack of transparency & conflict of interest.
#marginsci -
9/ Conflict of interest matters in science as well; not sure why you're collectively not aware of this given you're a party for science.
-
10/ Public was deceived via lack of transparency. Take this seriously. Understand this weakens potential policy impact march might have made
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Is gender and race relevant or not?https://twitter.com/OtherSociology/status/854308092439392260 …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.