Leader @SciencePartyAus criticising women for not joining his party's flagship event, @ScienceMarchAu https://twitter.com/jamesjansson/status/854264174846685184 … #marginsci
-
FWIW, in my work with the other cities' orgs I have never felt that they were pushing a partisan agenda. Here in CBR we have zero party orgs
As for having political candidates in SciMarch, not only have members, esp their leader, aggravated the situation with poor comms all day...
-
-
@jamesjansson is not an active org. He attended 1-2 open meetings in Sydney. He does not speak for us. -
And yet here he is, leader of
@SciencePartyAus, digging a hole for the march, with his candidates & executives firmly in march committee. -
1/ It hurts to hear the suggestion that James engineered my involvement in the march. Please direct any criticism about the involvement of
-
2/ this nonwhite woman in science, who naively thought she could keep her two volunteer passions separate, to me.
-
1/ "Please direct any criticism...to me" - you're already in this conversation so it's very much directed at you as much everyone on thread
-
2/ Don't play the
#WOC card on me - I am a WOC dedicated to WOC research & social justice making@ScienceMarchAu accountable for diversity -
3/ You & other members from
@SciencePartyAus are POLITICAL CANDIDATES currently raising money for your campaign. That's conflict of interestpic.twitter.com/pptNGRVFHF
-
4/ Political parties are required to make public their conflicts of interest.
@ScienceMarchAu has marketed it is non-partisan. This is COI - 6 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.