Leader @SciencePartyAus criticising women for not joining his party's flagship event, @ScienceMarchAu https://twitter.com/jamesjansson/status/854264174846685184 … #marginsci
-
-
1/2
@ScienceMarchAu is not a#SciParty event. Most of our orgs are women. I gave an interview today with a 2 yr old hanging from my nipple.1 reply 2 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @ErinVaughnAZ @OtherSociology and
2/2 We're not about to give
#SciParty the credit for our success ... or our failure.1 reply 2 retweets 5 likes -
The broader conversation today
@ErinVaughnAZ is that the@SciencePartyAus has 5 members in the@ScienceMarchAu That's a very big problem.1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @OtherSociology @ErinVaughnAZ and
The march has publicised heavily that it's non-partisan: it has 15 candidates running for pol seats. Five members in the March. That's a COI
2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
I pushed back strongly against the party's involvement. The orgs with party ties are acting as individuals. I wouldn't be involved otherwise
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
It's admirable that you pushed back. Non-partisan means, at the very least, not having political candidates in the national org committee.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
FWIW, in my work with the other cities' orgs I have never felt that they were pushing a partisan agenda. Here in CBR we have zero party orgs
4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
I understand you are saying there are differences between the satellites & national org. National org has exposed the march to a big problem
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.