Indeed. Excited to help increase exposure of science to the masses. Tons of work to do and everyone is welcome to join in and help out.
-
9/ Three of these five members who are/were involved in planning
@ScienceMarchAu are also Executive members of@SciencePartyAus.#marginsci
10/ Nowhere is COI publicly stated on @ScienceMarchAu. Major problem of transparency. Goes against non-partisan @ScienceMarchDC. #marginsci
-
-
Non partisan does not mean not political. It means not favouring a particular party. Important distinction.
-
4 of 5
@SciencePartyAus members involved with@ScienceMarchAu are political candidates. 3 of 5 are on your party executive.#marginsci -
This means the
@ScienceMarchAu *absolutely* favours one political party: yours,@SciencePartyAus.#marginsci -
Isn't a march for science always going to favour a political party called "Science Party" whether they're organisers or not?
-
That's not what's being pointed out here. It's been deliberately deceptive and politically motivated since the outset
-
There are members of at least 3 other political parties on the committee, that I know of. Science Party members abstain from many decisions.
- 5 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
I thought we wanted more scientists in politics? So now that they're in politics, they're no longer able to represent science?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.