@afinno, @Lukanis78 & I are on national committee in our personal capacity,declared SP affiliation early.Both orgs shortstaffed."Interests"?
-
8/ Plus the leader of
@SciencePartyAus,@jamesjansson who left, makes 5 conflict of interest of members in@ScienceMarchAu.#marginsci
9/ Three of these five members who are/were involved in planning @ScienceMarchAu are also Executive members of @SciencePartyAus. #marginsci
-
-
10/ Nowhere is COI publicly stated on
@ScienceMarchAu. Major problem of transparency. Goes against non-partisan@ScienceMarchDC.#marginsci -
Non partisan does not mean not political. It means not favouring a particular party. Important distinction.
-
4 of 5
@SciencePartyAus members involved with@ScienceMarchAu are political candidates. 3 of 5 are on your party executive.#marginsci -
This means the
@ScienceMarchAu *absolutely* favours one political party: yours,@SciencePartyAus.#marginsci -
Isn't a march for science always going to favour a political party called "Science Party" whether they're organisers or not?
-
That's not what's being pointed out here. It's been deliberately deceptive and politically motivated since the outset
-
There are members of at least 3 other political parties on the committee, that I know of. Science Party members abstain from many decisions.
- 5 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.