Dear @SciencePartyAus: do you have your members involved in planning the @ScienceMarchAu? Do you have org interests in march? #marginsci
-
7/ Just checked and 2 other
@SciencePartyAus members are in@ScienceMarchAu: Luke James & Jin-oh Choi: that's 4 current COI...#marginsci
8/ Plus the leader of @SciencePartyAus, @jamesjansson who left, makes 5 conflict of interest of members in @ScienceMarchAu. #marginsci
-
-
9/ Three of these five members who are/were involved in planning
@ScienceMarchAu are also Executive members of@SciencePartyAus.#marginsci -
10/ Nowhere is COI publicly stated on
@ScienceMarchAu. Major problem of transparency. Goes against non-partisan@ScienceMarchDC.#marginsci -
Non partisan does not mean not political. It means not favouring a particular party. Important distinction.
-
4 of 5
@SciencePartyAus members involved with@ScienceMarchAu are political candidates. 3 of 5 are on your party executive.#marginsci -
This means the
@ScienceMarchAu *absolutely* favours one political party: yours,@SciencePartyAus.#marginsci -
Isn't a march for science always going to favour a political party called "Science Party" whether they're organisers or not?
-
That's not what's being pointed out here. It's been deliberately deceptive and politically motivated since the outset
-
There are members of at least 3 other political parties on the committee, that I know of. Science Party members abstain from many decisions.
- 5 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.