I know @ScienceMarchDC’s history gives plenty of reason for paranoia, but this isn't actually M4S saying they’ll give e-mails to 3rd partieshttps://twitter.com/OtherSociology/status/852391765151813633 …
-
@OtherSociology et al's criticism resulted in a clarification in@sciencemagazine's piece about this. How is that "paranoia?"#marginscipic.twitter.com/CzeLrTnbHr
1/ To be clear, the pattern is this: SciMarch makes major scicomm error. Scientists using #Marginsci point out problems. SciMarch ignores.