I know @ScienceMarchDC’s history gives plenty of reason for paranoia, but this isn't actually M4S saying they’ll give e-mails to 3rd partieshttps://twitter.com/OtherSociology/status/852391765151813633 …
-
I’m sorry, how do you know that M4S put the journalist in touch with the George Mason U team?
2/2 If @ScienceMarchDC understood research ethics, they would not have been so cavalier in sharing this information with a journalist.
-
-
How is it “cavalier” to say that people have asked them about doing research on and around the March?
-
It is cavalier to tell the press that such an unethical request was made. Had they understood this, they would not mention it.
-
Yes, I’m quite clear that it would be unethical for social scientists to request the e-mail list, or for M4S to turn it over.
-
M4S does NOT describe such a request in the article,
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.