I know @ScienceMarchDC’s history gives plenty of reason for paranoia, but this isn't actually M4S saying they’ll give e-mails to 3rd partieshttps://twitter.com/OtherSociology/status/852391765151813633 …
Only reason journalist knows is @ScienceMarchDC told them. Had organisers understood request is unethical they should not have shared this.
-
-
I’m sorry, how do you know that M4S put the journalist in touch with the George Mason U team?
-
And wouldn’t it be ethically possible for M4S to e-mail their list with a request to opt in, without disclosing e-mails?
-
Maybe I’m missing something, but it seems like there’s lots of scope for a journalist oversimplifying something that wouldn’t be problematic
-
Not, to be clear, that there isn’t plenty of reason for an ungenerous reading, given the M4S track record.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.