Ethics? @ScienceMarchDC is considering supporting research including passing on emails of supporters http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2017/04/examine-thyself-researchers-set-study-march-science … #marginscipic.twitter.com/jTDk9jgTkn
For a march supposedly about science, lack of understanding of history, ethics & policies is astounding @ScienceMarchDC. #marginsci
-
-
[1/2] It's especially outrageous given the widespread public condemnation of recent attacks on online privacy by Republicans in US Congress.
-
[2/2] The importance of not sharing personal data without the permission of the people concerned has been emphasized a lot lately.
-
[3/2] Relevant update. March for Science won't be sharing email addresses. Not sure about rest of user data: https://twitter.com/ScienceInsider/status/852573879771987970 … .
-
No - there is no plan to share anything without consent, consistent with our privacy policy.
-
How did that misunderstanding happen?
-
The GMU researchers had asked March for Science organizers to distribute a notice about the surveys to their email & social media lists.
-
Apparently, this got mangled somewhere in reporting.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
How would they even get IRB approval for this?????
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.