Did @ScienceMarchDC make clear & seek informed consent from supporters that their contact details would be given to 3rd parties? #marginsci
Ethics? @ScienceMarchDC is considering supporting research including passing on emails of supporters http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2017/04/examine-thyself-researchers-set-study-march-science … #marginscipic.twitter.com/jTDk9jgTkn
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
For a march supposedly about science, lack of understanding of history, ethics & policies is astounding
@ScienceMarchDC.#marginsci -
[1/2] It's especially outrageous given the widespread public condemnation of recent attacks on online privacy by Republicans in US Congress.
-
[2/2] The importance of not sharing personal data without the permission of the people concerned has been emphasized a lot lately.
-
[3/2] Relevant update. March for Science won't be sharing email addresses. Not sure about rest of user data: https://twitter.com/ScienceInsider/status/852573879771987970 … .
-
No - there is no plan to share anything without consent, consistent with our privacy policy.
-
How did that misunderstanding happen?
-
The GMU researchers had asked March for Science organizers to distribute a notice about the surveys to their email & social media lists.
-
Apparently, this got mangled somewhere in reporting.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
March that has been hostile to URM
@ScienceMarchDC will be vetting research partners? When it can't enact basic diversity policy!#marginsciThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
A large component of
#marginsci discussions have been about history & current power dynamics of how science impacts on URM.@ScienceMarchDC.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
URM have consistently cited
@ScienceMarchDC numerous examples where informed consent was violated or where science exploited URM.#marginsciThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Organisers of
@ScienceMarchDC aren't experts on research ethics or science policy. That's abundantly clear. It's on show again.#marginsciThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Here they are again;
@ScienceMarchDC co-chair speaking to social science research he's not trained in. Major ethical issue.#marginsciThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This potentially violates anti-spam laws on top of confidentiality: you can't pass on email of subscribers
@ScienceMarchDC.#marginsciThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Researchers using public event/resources (eg. interviewing at march) is ok; but must follow ethical guidelines.
@ScienceMarchDC#marginsciThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@ScienceMarchDC passing on emails or making deals with researchers is NOT ethical. Exactly hubris & damage#marginsci have discussed.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Almost a week before the march &
@ScienceMarchDC has addressed NONE of the concerns on diversity; no proactive action as an org.#marginsci -
I'm especially weirded out by GMI's role in this. Their climate comm program is good and publishes solid social sci research.
-
Yes. Can
@GeorgeMasonU say why it's granted ethics approval to such a study asking for email addresses? https://twitter.com/OtherSociology/status/852391765151813633 …#marginsci
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.