All due respect, but yr conclusion seems backwards. EPA cuts are opposite of science. *Ignoring* science is political. No?
Science is political: EPA cuts greatest impact on "communities of colour, poor & Indigenous populations" https://newrepublic.com/article/141383/trumps-epa-cuts-literally-will-make-people-sick … #marginscipic.twitter.com/wQzoBQeHnz
-
-
-
Hi
@DrDeCaluwe. The phrase "science is political" is being used by scientists on#marginsci thread in response to@ScienceMarchDC -
Yes, been reading on that. The criticisms obv raise a critical point, but also miss the point, to a degree.
-
What do you mean?
-
(Twitter prolly bad venue, but here I go anyway) From my read, at least,
@ScienceMarchDC's 'science not political' stance + -
Not true. Read all the materials I've linked to in my article including various Storify.
-
Thanks, trying to go back & find those. But most 'science is political' articles/tweets/etc (incl. your OP)+
-
I've read (so far) seem to disagree on rhetoric basis, but then make the same point (*ignoring* science is a political act).
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.