I've assumed the diff is b/c so many scis & sci orgs are gov't funded & couldn't be involved if @ScienceMarchDC was explicitly anti-Trump.https://twitter.com/OtherSociology/status/842949855278333952 …
Becoming even more clear that this march never intended to stand with URM. White privilege governs. @kejames @ScienceMarchDC #marginsci
-
-
the women's march also took the intentional stance that it was not against Trump
-
it was obviously in response to him, and most marched with implicit or explicit oppositionto him
-
but they made sure they framed it as non-partisan and focusing on women's rights
-
Oh? I must have missed that. Maybe this is a lesson.
-
because we NEED to reach the GOP in Congress, and GOP voters
-
I think part of the problem is people get the concepts of "political" and "partisan" confused
-
Me too. They’re very different.
@OtherSociology@ScienceMarchDC
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.